One for all, and all for one!

R55Max, I apologize, but I agree with Seventsan. The table is simply terrible. :smile11: If one player has 1-0, the other should have 0-1. And even better, when one has 1 and the other has 0. Then everything is clear to everyone. If there is a second round, that's not a problem. You can always add the result, for example, 2-0 or 1-1, and even better, just 2 and 0, then everyone will immediately understand everything. The same applies to teams: the results could simply be added together; it could be 3-3 or 5-1, etc. I'll also add that the wording about two rounds could be replaced by saying that the participants play 2 games against each other, and the results should be entered into the table based on that. Or make 2 separate tables for each round, if that's really important. I understand that you took the system from football, but it's not the best option. Understand that everything should be simple, clear, accessible, and informative. Participants should be playing, not asking questions about tables, rules, or report writing formats. Be simpler, and people will be drawn to it. ;)