A true master doesn't have favorite tactics or techniques. He is equally good at everything. That's why he is a master.
And this
I agree! A master should know how to do things better in a given situation, but he can act according to his own preferences.
Actually, these are different things. (Not that I want to show everyone here that I'm a master. I don't have that goal). I'm just nitpicking the words :D
For example, some people build wasps for Wistan, while others prefer to upgrade lizards. Isn't that a favorite tactic? (and some people will build a viv). And they still play and win. And you can find many "preferences" in the style of strong players.
(I'm not denying that someone might say that I'm not very original and unique. But if you start "observing" and track every step over a long period of time, you can still find patterns in their style)
Now, about your phrase, Dirty. "A master should know how to do things better in a given situation, but he can act according to his own preferences." Are you saying that someone who can play perfectly, following a strict pattern, with all races can be called a "master"? Not some clumsy player, but someone who plays equally well with all races? Is that even possible?
And wouldn't such an ideal, hypothetical player have favorite tactics and techniques?
_______
:D :D :D
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того