1st annual offline tournament "Best Of The Best"

We could give everyone a rating equal to the last place in Impossible mode. Or not count it at all.

Well, look what happens again.
1. Not counting it at all - If we don't count it at all, it might offend someone, and VDV and I will break our promise (we said we would calculate for everyone - it's another matter that the "normal" players might demand that they be removed, as they didn't know about the coefficients in advance).
2. Setting it to the level of the last place in Impossible mode - why, if even with those coefficients, they don't all take the last places, and some of them even outperform some from Impossible mode with the coefficients.

Regarding the system - I meant which option will be adopted as the main one at the start? Non-linear or oscillator?

I don't care, and I feel that VDV and I won't agree, because your rating is Cumulative - you have a 10% aging, and the rating will most likely only decrease for the player in last place due to the second component. For everyone else, it will constantly increase until it reaches the ceiling. In my system, the rating is Current, and we've seen how it can increase and decrease (you yourself provided a good example of this) depending on the results shown by players in tournaments. I want to calculate both ratings and I want them to be published (they can be on different pages). Who, how, and for what purpose and which of the ratings will be used further, I don't care. Personally, I want to see the current rating to compare my rating with the ratings of other players over time. I know at least one person who liked the idea that, depending on the game, on how well or poorly you played in relation to the leader, you can change your position in the table for the better or worse - that was Prophet. Therefore, access to view both tables should be available. Who looks at what is up to each player. The administration can also use any of the tables for its own purposes.

So, VDV, where did you go? Therefore, I will post the preliminary results of the current rating myself.
What is the purpose?
1. "Normal" players may demand to be removed from the table. The rest, look and check, maybe you will find an error in the calculations :) The formulas are in the corresponding branch of this topic.
In my system, only one thing has been changed: the leader now receives a maximum of 100 points for the tournament, instead of 50. Everything else remains the same.
2. AmberSoler, please take a look at how I formatted everything there, and in a similar style, or even better, do the calculation for your system at least once and post it here too, you promised me templates.
3. In our system, we will flexibly age the rating; it will be allowed to skip 1-2 tournaments without aging the rating. For now, the aging remains the same at 33%. Let me know the aging policy in your system (% aging, if any, and bonus, if any).
4. Request to VDV - find a way to publish the rating tables in your topic in a readable form, rather than by uploading files, if possible.