1st annual offline tournament "Best Of The Best"

1. We won't be using the "Normal" difficulty in the future. It's just not serious. The coefficients were pulled out of thin air. What was the point of arguing about the details of the calculation and its connection to reality if we're just going to insert some unknown value from who knows where?

I agree.

2. If VDV agrees to include the scores of the three current "Normal" players in the overall standings (without infringing on the interests of the "Impossible" players), then that's how it should be. If they don't agree, then we'll forget about it.

But how can it be done without infringing on their interests? Aren't their coefficients already not the best?

Has a system already been adopted? I haven't seen any announcements about it.

I sent VDV a table even before I started discussing it with you.
As part of an experiment, etc. You read this thread, and we talked about it. VDV and Prophet agreed, and I promised VDV that I would calculate the rating based on VDV tournaments. VDV and Prophet accepted my system. I got involved here hoping for a unified rating. What kind of agreement do I need other than VDV agreeing to publish the rating? I'm not forcing anyone to look at it. I just want them to agree to publish the results for both systems. If they won't publish them, what's the point of me calculating them? You yourself say that there's no point in voting. Only a few people were involved in our discussion.