Skip to content

Thoughts on the scenario after completing "Hammers of Fate".

User Avatar
#62
Auto-translated
Knight of the Abyss
It is undeniable that Railag is not as simple as he seems, but remember the battle video. There were only Agrael and Nicholas, and no one else. As a result of the battle, Agrael wounds Nicholas (most likely mortally) and leaves. Nicholas remains alone for some time, and no one sees him. It turns out that Biara could only have killed him during this period (if Agrael only lightly wounded him, and not mortally). Let's assume that's what happened; Biara killed him, but why didn't Agrael deny the fact that he killed Nicholas during his conversation with Tieru? Tieru: "But why did you kill Nicholas? Come on, Agrael, there should be no secrets between us." Agrael: "Uh... it was all because of Isabel..."

No, I believe that Agrael killed Nicholas after all. If it had been Biara, they would have definitely shown it to us. I wanted to say that Railag seems to have blamed Biara for everything, even though she was completely innocent (it's amazing: Biara has killed so many: Beatrice, Tieru, Andrias, and Godric; and yet she was blamed for something she was actually innocent of).

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem