and in an excel spreadsheet, show me on my system—given a major situation you've imagined—the same illogical situations as in my>
The calculation methodology based on the first parameter (using the recent tournament as an example) will lead to the following scenario under quite plausible developments.
1. With rating decay at 1/10, the gap in results among tournament participants who did not take} 1st place is only about 3 points, which is disproportionate to the effort expended.
2. With rating decay at 1/3, a player who took 2nd place will receive 16 points fewer than a player who took last place.
Moreover, the probability of such a situation arising is very high—it only takes one relatively strong player appearing in the tournament.
The behavior of the oscillator (with rating decay at 1/10) was proposed as a comparison to evaluate the smoothing effect on the resulting imbalance.
Please provide your comments.
