Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

Besides the correct mathematical formulas, I don't see any logical connections in your system. And I've already shown you with an example that they don't work correctly. Show me the shortcomings of my system in that Excel table, based on the first tournament, even with the infamous zeros. And then I'll give you a specific answer. When you started talking about specifics, I spent the whole day today coming up with an example. But when I tell you to now show me something specific, you're just talking nonsense that I'm a math profan, although I don't argue, but I would have liked to see your example in Excel.

I've already told you that your calculations are correct. But your interpretation, in my opinion, is incorrect. We're not arguing about the correctness of rearranging numbers and coefficients, but about the validity of taking into account the player's position.

You say that the position doesn't matter. I say it does. How else can I show this with numbers? It's already clear from our calculations. You don't want the position to matter and you're surprised why in my calculations, the rating of the underdog is halved and slightly increased for those who are higher in the table. What's so surprising about that, if that was the goal when writing the oscillator - the higher the position, the more significant the bonus...

What should I give you as an example in Excel? What?
I'm talking about logic and common sense in evaluating a player's result. Not about numbers.