Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

It would be better if you modeled a similarly absurd situation according to my rating calculation scheme and showed the shortcomings in numbers, and made a clear conclusion. This would be beneficial to the matter.

I have already modeled it when one strong player resets the rating for all the other 100 participants in the tournament... Isn't that enough for you? :)

Incorrect approach. You not only don't have the right, but you ARE OBLIGED to show the shortcomings of the system I proposed in numbers and with examples...

But HOW?, if

...the numbers are fair, but I don't know what to do with them, I'm not good at math :(

Well, I said I'm not good at math :) I didn't take into account that...

Forgive me for the quotes, but even simple mathematical calculations cannot demonstrate to you the inconsistency of your beliefs. And you claim to want a detailed analysis "in numbers"... I can, of course, do this, but I'm afraid it will go unnoticed, like everything else... :)

So, what's the point of talking in vain if my arguments, unfortunately, are not considered by you from a mathematical point of view? :D It is mathematics that ensures balance; you appeal to selective observations, as I have already said. It is not correct to do this. And that's all, let's put an end to the dispute due to the lack of meaning. :)

The proposal to give a minimum score to the top ten outsiders was also not accepted.

In my opinion, it was you who were against this option... :D :D :D And the reason for your disagreement was that the outsider was given a little "free" rating. And now you are indignant...

...that the rating of the outsider is halved for last place. To finish them off, so to speak, with your feet :)

It is halved for the same reason that the rating starts to increase for a higher place... :) The oscillator adjusts the result depending on the place taken. Last place is always worse than any other place. Your coefficient simply doesn't realize this, which is a pity... :D

I already have a solution. I will have to keep a rating for VDV tournaments in Heroes using two systems in order to REALLY assess which one is more suitable for the game. I know the main points and formulas of yours.

Okay. Your decision to conduct two ratings for the sake of the experiment is commendable. But here, the main thing is not the correctness of the calculations, but the correct interpretation of the results obtained. I hope you have enough understanding to avoid making mistakes, because, after all, you can argue endlessly.

I suggest suspending the discussion about balance until significant and statistically reliable tournament results are obtained. Is that okay?