I fully admit that these statements may have taken place.
But:
1 Literature, theater, cinema, and later TV—that is, culture—we inherited from them. The Americans' culture was corrupted first. Specifically the cult of violence, sex, etc. Let us not forget the sexual revolution that happened there in the 60s
So it turns out that to corrupt the Union, they specifically corrupted themselves first)
Western ("American") culture degraded and became corrupted not on its own (nothing happens on its own), but due to the destructive influence of this Kali Age, as did all other cultures. It is simply that the speed of this degradation varies, depending on whether moral foundations have been preserved or not.
The Americans themselves (not their "government") are for the most part normal, friendly, religious people, very pious from a material point of view.
We inherited our culture from ancient, pre-Christian, Vedic or Venedic Rus, and not from "Americans." This western culture (or rather its complete absence) was only artificially introduced and imposed on the territory of Rus at least since the times of Peter I. The goal of which was to destroy the Vedic Slavic cultures.
And naturally, the methods and means by which they destroy the culture in Russia and the culture itself—the "American government," a Hasidic-Freemason group—were partially tested on their "own" people, the Americans.
2 Drug addiction existed among us, but not on scales comparable to theirs.
In India, China, Saudi Arabia, and many other countries, drug trafficking is punishable by death. In the USSR, it was also so for a time.
The point is that drug addiction does not spread on its own! It is artificially and forcibly imposed because territories and resources are needed now, but the population living in this territory, the bastards, do not want to die quickly.
3 Drunkenness is a separate point, as is bribery. Both are in our genes, so there is no sense in grafting what is already there)
If you truly think that drunkenness is in our genes—then they have won!; they finally hammered into the head of the Russian and Slavic peoples that we are drunkards, that drunkenness is in our blood, in our genes since the creation of the world, that we never had our own culture, that before the arrival of European missionaries we were savages hanging from branches upside down.
But heavily concealed historical documents say quite the opposite:
For example, during Nicholas II, the level of alcohol consumed per capita was the lowest in the world! And this was only a hundred years ago!
In the USSR, the level of alcohol consumed per capita increased many times (compared to Tsarist Russia), but it was still far from the highest in the world.
But since the collapse of the USSR and the start of Gorbachev's "perestroika," for some reason it began to grow geometrically, and they started hammering into people's heads (there is no other way to say it) that a Russian person is a drunkard, a bribe-taker, and an ignoramus, and that he has always been drinking without waking up since the time of Adam and Eve. And they actually hammered it in!
At the moment, it stands at 18.5 liters of alcohol consumed per capita per year (including women and children!).
According to sociological scientists studying this issue, at 14 liters of alcohol consumed per capita per year, irreversible degradation begins, the withering of a nation.
What can be said about the pre-Christian Vedic, Venedic culture—by the time of the bloody baptism of Rus by "Vladimir Krasno Solnyshko," which occurred approximately 1000 years ago, this Vedic culture had already existed for more than 4000 years; during this process (baptism), more than 40,000 volkhvs (priests) were simply killed, and the population of Rus (or Tartary or the land of Gardariki as the Greeks called it) decreased from 9 million to 3 million. Genealogies were destroyed, history was completely rewritten, the alphabet and language distorted.
And these ancestors of ours were not alcoholics, drunkards, bribe-takers, cowards, or ignoramuses, as they try in every way to convince us.
They were intellectuals, brave warriors, traders, skilled builders, etc. Women were raised from childhood in chastity, in respect for father and mother, for elders, in respect for their future husband as a Master. In men, control of feelings and responsibility were cultivated from childhood. A red thread through all the upbringing of a man was the idea that there are only 2 deaths worthy: in battle defending the principles of religion and morale without showing one's back to the enemy, and in the realization of God (that is, trying to realize that I am not this coarse physical body, nor even a subtle mental body, but a soul residing inside these bodies, like a driver inside a car).
Can such a people be defeated?
And those who planned and practically implemented a project so grandiose in its scale and treachery understood this perfectly. But by making them drink, corrupting them, and destroying their culture, any people can be defeated without fire or sword.
4 National enmity. In the States it also exists—I know not from TV or the internet, but from acquaintances. But because nationalities are mixed, the enmity has a local character
In the Sovok, the situation was different. The most multinational state in the world naturally implied potential conflicts; one only had to add a little spark.
So the reason for national enmity is that people of different nations (faiths, views, world-understandings) live side by side in one country?
India today is the most multi-confessional country; why then is there no such enmity there?
In my view, the reason lies not in the number of nationalities per square meter living within one state, but in the level of culture.
I basically agree here, but the postulate "divide and conquer" was not invented by Dulles.
You are right, this is a principle of Kali—the personality known in the Bible as the devil, the tempting serpent.
And Kali who comes in the fourth, final epoch of the cycle, after Satya-yuga (1 728 000 years), Treta-yuga (1 296 000 years), Dvapara-yuga (864 000 years), into Kali-yuga (432 000 years) in which we live.
In the Bhavishya Purana there is a section that tells the story of the beginning of Kali-yuga, about Adam and Avyevati (Adam and Eve)—there Kali says to the sages gathered in the Naimisharanya forest that to stop the destructive influence of this Kali age, they must perform their duty while he will perform his. And that he will spread his influence through Adam and Avyevati, through Adam's tribe.
5 Spirituality and morality were broken before his speeches.
That is exactly the point—that the culture of the Russian people (the most rebellious, in their words) was destroyed long before him, with him, and they continue to destroy both the culture and the people today.
Large-scale intoxication, corruption, and destruction of the moral foundations of society began in the time of Peter I: who left as a young fair-haired youth speaking Russian perfectly on a journey through Europe for several months—and returned after 2 years as a 40-year-old dark-haired man, not speaking Russian until the end of his reign, suffering from epilepsy and homosexuality. After his arrival, his wife was killed and the part of the army she raised to fight was destroyed; numerous other relatives who naturally could not fail to see this substitution were also killed.
The destruction of chronicles and genealogies began; large-scale construction of taverns and similar establishments (in which tobacco and alcohol were initially distributed for free) and brothels began; moreover, a decree was issued on the obligation of representatives of noble families and nobility to visit such establishments. Homosexuality was propagated as normal and natural in the army. Constant so-called "Evenings for the Nobility" began, which ended in group orgies, etc.
There is a vast amount of historical evidence for this.
________
In the Kali Age, under the destructive influence of this epoch—any culture begins to wither over time and completely decline.
But nothing happens on its own; degradation in this iron age is caused by the influence of this personality—Kali, who realizes his destructive influence through the descendants of Adam and Eve.
In whose hands today are the International Monetary Fund, the UN, UNESCO, NATO, and the banking systems of almost all countries in the world, except perhaps Iran, India, and China. In their hands is the largest "American" army today, and practically all Western and Russian media.
And these cannibals of the 21st century (I don't know how else to call them) treacherously continue to destroy Africa with AIDS, Northern peoples—specifically Russia, Ukraine, Belarus—with alcohol and tobacco, corruption and poverty, and Muslim countries and India, which do not take these vices, simply by war. Which can now be observed in Syria.
So what is the point of all this: if they did participate, then not that much;)
In general, yes, you are right, indeed not that much!
First, they pitted head-to-head two of the strongest empires at the time (both Slavs and Germans were also Aryans)—the Germans and the Slavs (making a good profit on the blood and guts of our fathers and mothers), in which more than 50 million people died from the Russian side alone (and these were the bravest, most enduring, healthiest men—the gene pool of the nation). At least 20 million of whom simply rotted in camps (about which one can read in detail in Solzhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago") and who did this? Their own government! Lenin (Ulyanov, Blank), Stalin (Jughashvili), Trotsky (Leiba), Beria, etc.—all Jews across the board.
They organized every single economic crisis, including the Great American Depression and the 2008 "crisis," during which in Russia the number of dollar billionaires increased from 40 to 100.
They annexed Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, ignoring all international law—after the "Americans" entered Afghanistan, drug trafficking into Russia through and from it increased dozens of times.
The Taliban destroyed, fought, and burned cocaine plantations; the Americans forbade them from doing this, and now they guard these cocaine fields.
When I was at a school internship from an institute, I personally heard conversations of 10th and 11th-grade girls several times, the essence of which was that being a virgin at 16 is a disgrace. "What? Who do you take me for? I haven't been a virgin for a long time. I've already had 10 or 20 different sexual partners." In essence, this is the same as saying: "Do you think I am some kind of chaste girl? No, what are you talking about, I am an ordinary, normal whore."
Is it not obvious that young snot-nosed kids are getting hooked on drugs and alcohol, and virginity, which was previously considered the main female treasure, is now ridiculed and devalued in every way in the eyes of young girls?
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации