Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Let me give you some advice: even if you are Mafia and your partner has expressed an opinion (and his opinion is that Amko had an opinion), have your own opinion to avoid being exposed. And in general, there is a chain of people who trust each other: Amko expressed his mega-opinion in a note, about which I have already explained that it was ONE (if you like probabilities, I will say that your drinking buddy Arandor said that the Bison could have various roles, including a merchant, calculate the probability that he was SPECIFICALLY a merchant (by the way, a merchant's note arrived tonight)), Arandor supported Amko's opinion, and you support the opinion of A R A N D O R, whose opinion consists of supporting Amko's opinion. Therefore, Amko may not be Mafia, but the connection between you and Arats is already completely exposed. It can be completely exposed by voting for me. So keep in mind, "Arandor already explained" is not an answer.
Added 2 minutes ago Drakkosha
I didn't promise extremely complex clues; the chains can be quite long, but a number of links in them are obvious and quite unambiguous.
"Unnatural" does not mean ambiguous links. I'm talking about the initial link. Not everyone will create clues by latching onto some line from a signature. That's what it meant.