then he could have hinted at it somehow in the thread. right?
Koshya already wrote that in that case, the murder would be described not from the commander's point of view, but from the point of view of the maniac. the commander was 100% the one who killed. there's no need to tie the clue to it.
I was guided by the rules, which state:
ND:
Own troops: can perform any action available in the game (except for double ramming and royal army), inherits the characteristics of the chosen type of murder
But it turns out that the GM wrote somewhere that in reality everything is completely different. And also this strange, deleted message. I'm confused. But I won't withdraw my vote. If she is actually the commander and they execute her, you can throw rotten tomatoes at me.