IronAxe
Auto-translated
That makes sense. I don't object. This will resolve the issue and eliminate unlikely individual events. Just suggest your vision regarding the number of players, because it's difficult to determine everything here... My tournament experience in the third game shows that there are never fewer than ten (usually significantly more). But for the second game, 10 people is normal... I think we need to approach this flexibly.
Added 3 minutes later
But is it worth dragging this out for so long if the only question was about the number of people? I was proceeding from your fundamental position, but the whole thing was only about this... :)
But I said right away today that if nothing changes with the second component, then we need to determine the number of participants for the tournament to be counted towards the rating. Before, I thought that even two people should be counted.
