But first, shouldn't we assess your proposed reward system and then decide whether to approve it or not? Isn't that the right approach?;)

Exactly. This system was only finalized yesterday...

I don't see the point in voting for it in the way the voting process is structured. The entire process of familiarizing oneself with all the methods is too long and complex... And there is no objectivity in the voting without detailed comments from each participant – you are right about that. Simply ticking a box and forgetting about it is not the kind of question that should be left to chance...

Everyone who was interested has already expressed their opinion on the matter in this thread, and the final version was created taking into account the opinions of everyone who wanted to contribute. We should simply gather the opinions of all participants here, rather than posting announcements everywhere... :)

So, take a look at the calculation table. Those who are interested can experiment with the numbers in the proposed table and see what happens when the number of tournament participants increases/decreases, when the composition of the leaders changes, when very strong players appear among the leaders, etc. Everything is clear and easy to understand. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.