One for all, and all for one!

The table looks a bit off. I think it would be better to use a chess-like plan – a total score between the teams. For example, 6:0, and on the other side, 0:6, and so on, or 5:1 - 1:5. Otherwise, it's hard to understand. In this format, EVERY game will contribute to the overall result. As it is now, you win two games, and the third game essentially doesn't matter. It removes the incentive to play it. Here!