ariputra
Auto-translated
ariputra, unfortunately, ignorance is not just a "side effect of laziness." Has it occurred to you that by reading sermons on "Hero's World," you yourself are merely carrying others' words and thoughts? Retransmission, transmission—but where are you in all this? Lost in the grip of fears? Hysteria has seized you. There is a thought—I heard it in the late 90s, but it is much older: a master is recognized by the fact that he does not make mistakes; therefore, those who pretend to be masters will always be comical. Well, what you are preaching to us mostly carries hysteria, farce, many judgments, but very little actual action. Although this truly requires intelligence and something extraordinary. Do you have that? Or does the role of a fighter against windmills suit you better?
Allen Dulles—please remember this name—was a very capable man, and he NEVER WROTE such NONSENSE!!!
Here are the words of the White Guard member Lakhnovsky from the novel "The Eternal CALL":
Lead them to the thought that they must rely on God, lure them into a sect, and if none exists, organize one yourself!.. Slavs love to sing after a glass of vodka. Remind them how excellently they brewed moonshine during the Civil War. (…) We will arm those fond of sharp words with anecdotes mocking their present and future. (…) Poison the souls of the youth with disbelief in the meaning of life, awaken interest in sexual problems, lure them with baits of the free world such as fashionable dances, beautiful clothes, records of a special nature, poems, songs (…). Set the young against the older generation»
Does this remind you of anything?
Ariputra, you suggest replacing one lie with another, simply so that those standing at the distribution point are not the people who are there now, but another clan with its own statutes. But will this give anything for the benefit of the people?
Why do we see a work written NOT in American, nor even British English as a "Dulles" forgery? The linguistic turns are not characteristic of an "official report." Why can't the national lobby provide the original TEXT in the source language? Perhaps it doesn't exist at all. For the sake of fairness, I once found a text related to US military doctrine belonging to Dulles, which perhaps served as the prototype for the forgery; believe me, that document contains no stream of feverish delirium.
Regarding the "GOLDEN BILLION." I specifically did not interest myself in this topic due to its complete degeneracy and blatant same-day shock value. Unfortunately, I found only these idiotic links, but in reality, one needs to actually visit the USA.
http://images.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=%D0%B6%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5%20%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%8B%20%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE&img_url=www.infendo.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F04%2Ffat_american_kids.jpg&pos=5&rpt=simage&lr=105154&noreask=1
AND THIS IS THE NATION OF THE GOLDEN BILLION??
to all: my apologies for the mistakes and typos in previous posts.
___________________________________________________________
thought about how to respond
it's not that there are no arguments (there are plenty), I just see no point in arguing. Disagree? Think differently? Please, nobody is forbidding you.
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
If the image is reduced, some of its parts will be hard to read.
____________________________________________________________
The excerpt (similar in meaning to the "Dulles Plan") that you provided is not from the novel "The Eternal Call"; it is from Dold-Mikhaylik's 1956 novel "One Man is a Soldier." In Volume 2 of the novel The Eternal Call, but only starting with the 1981 edition, there appears a statement by a former Russian gendarme officer similar to the "Dulles Plan" or directive NSC 20/1 of 1948. But what did you want to say by this?
Further, you say that the linguistic turns of the "Dulles Plan" excerpt I provided are not characteristic of official reports.
But Oelm, what are you—an expert in the field of linguistic research of official reports? How did you determine this? Or tell me who is saying this?
The original of directive NSC 20/1 or the "Dulles Plan" - http://sakva.ru/Nick/NSC_20_1.html, in my view, this is only a part of it, but either way, as a fact of its existence.
translation - http://sakva.ru/Nick/NSC_20_1R.html.
There is also a link to scans of this directive.
Please, answer me just one question:
If such a cannibalistic, treacherous plan (even if its author was not Allen Dulles) aimed at the destruction of Russia, Russian and Slavic culture and the people as a whole does not exist, then why is everything described there being implemented and currently realized in exactly this way, by these methods and means, as described therein?
this part isn't there, but they aren't fools to announce their plans aloud in advance:
Quote, dated 1948:
Allen Dulles - head of US political intelligence in Europe, who later became Director of the CIA:
"Literature, theater, cinema—everything will depict and glorify the lowest human feelings. We will support everyone who instills a cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal—in short, every kind of immorality—into the human consciousness. In state administration, we will create chaos and confusion; we will subtly but actively and constantly promote the tyranny of officials, bribery, and lack of principle. Honesty and integrity will be mocked and become unnecessary to anyone, turning into a relic of the past. Rudeness and insolence, lies and deceit, drunkenness and drug addiction, betrayal, nationalism and enmity between peoples—all this we will cultivate in people's consciousness. And only a few, very few, will guess what is happening, but such people we will put in a helpless position, turn into laughingstocks, find a way to slander them and declare them outcasts of Soviet society. We will tear out spiritual roots, vulgarize and destroy the foundations of own national Soviet morality. In this way, we will shake generation after generation. We will fight for people from childhood and youth.
We will always place our main bet on the youth; we will decompose, corrupt, and debase them. That is how we will do it all."
Even if Allen Dulles is not the author of this plan, does that fundamentally change anything?
But the "Dulles Plan" or "Reflections on the Implementation of the American Post-War Doctrine Against the USSR" contains the phrase:
"Episode by episode, a tragedy of grand scale will unfold—the death of the most stubborn people">
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The level of alcohol consumed in Russia has reached 18L per person per year (including women and children). Official statistics claim completely different figures.
Academician Uglov, who dedicated his life to studying this issue:
"At 10L of alcohol consumed per year per capita, the irreversible degradation of the nation begins—degeneracy."
He also asserts that beer and champagne are the most poisonous types of alcohol.
Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow and All Russia: "We must realize that a well-planned war is being waged against the Russian people with the goal of destroying them".
In fact, an alcoholic and narcotic terror is currently being waged against Russia and Belarus:
A city beer festival was held in Minsk, and as part of this festival, a grand rock concert was organized for the youth; beer flowed like a river, young fashionably dressed girls were persistently offered to smoke cigarettes of a specific brand—free, just smoke. A thunderstorm began, and these youths, dazed by beer and cigarettes, rushed into a metro underpass and trampled 57 young girls to death. Moreover, the next day, forensic medical examination established that all 57 girls were also drunk.
Alcohol subtly turns people into beasts.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
It is my deepest conviction that in any field there are far more qualified people than I am.
Is it not logical to consider one's own opinion in light of the opinion of a person much more qualified in the particular area under discussion?
But pride (the feeling of one's own exceptionality) which has lived in our hearts since time immemorial says: "How am I any worse? I have MY own opinion; so what if they have more experience in this matter? My opinion is at least not any worse, and I have no authorities, no one who could understand anything better than me"
"A person who has no authorities has no point of support; it is impossible to prove anything to them. This is merely a waste of time."
ariputra, and what do the Zionist sages intend to do with Africa, India, China, South America? The same as with Russia?
If you are truly interested, read "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"—everything is described there in detail, with adjustments for time, place, and circumstances.
They are destroying Africa with AIDS, northern countries with alcohol, drugs, and debauchery.
And as for Muslim countries and India, which neither alcohol nor debauchery can take, they decided to destroy them by war. Which is what is happening now: Iraq, Libya, currently Syria, then Iran.
Also, attempts do not cease to ignite a conflict between two nuclear powers, India and Pakistan (which was once part of India).
_______
Everyone remembers that on September 11, two towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed. The first report chilled the soul: 50 thousand victims—the largest terrorist act in the world. Three days later: 9 thousand victims. A week later: 4.5 thousand. Final data: 1 thousand 500 people, of whom 600 were police and firefighters who arrived at the scene of the disaster. In these two towers, 900 people died—where are Zin's victims? (I by no means belittle the tragedy that occurred, but…)
Why did nobody die in those towers??? It turns out a month before this attack, a direct warning that an attack on the World Trade Center was being prepared was published in all Masonic secret publications. In a Russian-language Masonic magazine called "Arrangement and Repair," a week before the attack on September 3, a picture was published on the front cover depicting: two towers of the World Trade Center, with a white flag against them; in this flag is a sign prohibiting parking or presence within them—and again, these two towers are in that sign—showing where radio beacons will be located (planes were guided by radio beacons) and showing that the top will be burned, will burn. Next to it was a simple decryption: Air attack September 11.
During the month, personnel, office equipment, and chests of gold were evacuated from there. Who then died there? Elevator operators, cloakroom attendants, buffet workers, cleaners—the service staff died.
The most important thing is that after this provocation, the USA—the world's main terrorist—said: we don't give a damn about the UN anymore, we don't give a damn about international law; we will now declare any country a harborer of terrorists and start bombing, and let anyone try to say a word to us.
Having gained this moral right to fight global terrorism, they have already smashed Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya; Syria is next, then Iran.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A story about Alexander the Great and a soul that realized itself:
Once, Alexander the Great said to one of his generals: "We will not conquer all of India; it is impossible; we shall go home." (There, a very serious illness struck his entire army. They were pursued by unfavorable climatic conditions, and he also greatly admired the nobility of the Indian warriors.)
And there was a maharaja named Paras; he could have defeated Alexander completely, Hindus could have easily crushed his army, and Paras was not the emperor of India—he was a raja of the border zone, and he alone could destroy Alexander's entire army; he was a Maharatha.
[Kshatriya—a warrior by birth, by nature, a person for whom shame is worse than death; ratha—a trained Kshatriya capable of fighting 10 Kshatriyas simultaneously and winning; adiratha—capable of fighting 100 rathas simultaneously and winning; Maharatha—capable of fighting 1000 adirathas simultaneously and winning].
In the word Ratha, the letter "h" may not be read, hence rata - rat (army), orat (shout), dratsya (fight), etc.
And when this was understood, Alexander sent his mistress Thais Athene to him; he knew that Hindus are very religious, and he decided to play on their religiosity. In India there is a day called the day of brotherhood (when a woman chooses a brother for herself and ties a red string on his hand, and this man must swear that he will protect her all his life, and the woman swears that she will pray for his well-being all her life). Thais Athene came to this raja, saying: I want to choose you as my brother; she tied him a red string and swore that she would now pray for him every day, and Paras swore that he would protect her. And Paras could not go against religion—dharma (duty) is above feelings, above everything (if it is necessary for dharma to lose, I will lose; if necessary, I will win).
And when the battle began, Maharaja Paras caught up with Alexander, knocked him off his chariot and prepared to kill him without any effort; he threw him to the ground and swung his sword to cut off his head, and as he swung, he saw the red string on his hand. Paras knew that Thais Athene was Alexander's mistress and he thought: "if I kill him now, my sister will suffer." Paras turned around, climbed onto an elephant and left. Alexander got up and began to shout that he possessed siddhis, that a guru had taught him, and that it was because of this that Paras stopped and left. Alexander wanted to show that he had lost nothing. But the true reason was that Paras spared him like a dog—no more, no less. A Kshatriya is responsible for any word given by him, and only the fact that Paras gave his word to Thais Athene saved Alexander's life.
Alexander recovered, gathered a new army and attacked. Now he went ahead of the army, but Paras did not want to kill him and began fighting others. Alexander won the victory. After this, he said that we will not conquer India to the end, but I must fulfill the will of my spiritual teacher—Aristotle; he told me to bring him as a gift a Sannyasi (a person leading a renounced way of life) who has fully realized himself as a soul.
Alexander sent his generals to search for a sannyasi, but not one who is still on the path to truth, but one who had fully realized himself. And the generals began to search, asking people; and when the Hindus learned that they were leaving, and that the last thing remaining was to give them some sannyasi as a gift, people naturally began to remember who among us is a soul that has realized itself (but the Hindus understood that a soul that has realized itself cannot be given to anyone). And they pointed to a man named Dadhanti, who was already beyond name and form; he stood naked on one leg on the bank of the Ganges.
And these generals understood a little what a great sage is. They laid down their weapons, approached, bowed and said: "O great sage, Alexander the Great invites you to Greece; you will be given the greatest honors, everything you want—luxury, hotel, if you want fruits, cheese, whatever… in general, cinema, wine, and dominoes, a carpet, a saddle, and a television." This sannyasi smiled and said: "Excuse me, but I didn't intend to go to Greece." To which they said: "the comrade doesn't understand, the comrade needs to be explained—Alexander THE GREAT invites you with him to Greece." The sannyasi again calmly replied that he did not intend to go to Greece. And since they are warriors, anger immediately seized them; they thought: "now we'll chop him up into soy sausage, but first we should still consult Sanya." The generals reported to San Sanych that the sannyasi does not wish to go to Greece.
To which Alexander said: "how can this be, am I not Chapayev?" he also knew Chapayev from movies and jokes: "who is he? I am Alexander Alexandrovich, I am San Sanych, I am the president of the campaign—the military one—and who is HE???" To which the generals told him: "well, don't be upset, you are so Great; go there, maybe you'll succeed; this sannyasi is standing there and saying that no one and nothing will move him from his spot."
Alexander came, looks—there stands this naked guy on one leg, like a tin soldier. Alexander approached, bowed and said: "O great sage, could I invite you with me to Greece?" To which the sage said very calmly: "this is not in my plans." Alexander immediately flew into a rage; an insulting mood appeared (because he is Great, and one cannot act this way with the Great); he drew his saber and said: "I'll cut your head off right now."
The sannyasi smiled, there was not a shadow of fear on his face: "go ahead, chop it, and we will laugh together at how it rolls."
Alexander paused, put away the sword, bowed and understood what Aristotle had wanted to tell him when he set off for India: "that you cannot actually conquer India, because there is a spiritual India and there is a material India; they would simply laugh at you, at how you grabbed all this, but they would never submit to you—their spirit is not broken and cannot be broken."
Alexander returned to Greece.
Aristotle: Well, did you bring me the sannyasi who realized himself?
Alexander: No.
Aristotle: You didn't even find him?
Alexander: I found him but… I told him about it.
Aristotle was very pleased and said: well then I ask you—realize yourself first!
And when Alexander died, his hands protruded; they were open palms up, and when people asked why the emperor is being carried this way, the soldiers said that he ordered it to show that he could take nothing with him, and that he realized this very late.
Alexander was very reasonable. He was a student of Aristotle, Aristotle was a student of Plato, and Plato was a student of Socrates, and Socrates was—almost a soul that had realized itself; and this knowledge was passed on, but less and less over time.
Therefore, he did eventually understand, but only on his deathbed, when he had become almost the emperor of the world—that he had lived his life in vain, that everything he did was madness, and that he himself was mad, but death cut this understanding short. And on the threshold of death, he wildly lamented what he had done.
Дурман мирской любви сильнее яда кобры, он глупым может сделать мудреца и увести от цели благородной и дух и волю война храбреца.
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации