Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
Dmitriy A S - 183.1 Radik - 193.9 VDV_forever - 160.7
Everything seems to be working fine here. AmberSoler;60507
Why are you only thinking about this now? A month ago, when you published your calculation mechanism, didn't this bother you? The rating should have been calculated using a completely different scheme back then, not the one you initially started with... Or, let's give the winner 10 points instead of 100. Then the loser will get 4 instead of 40 and will immediately "give up"...
At least I had some kind of mechanism, but I didn't understand at all how VDV calculated it, so I suggested this scheme - it couldn't be simpler. Then, with me, the increase wasn't as noticeable due to the strong aging effect. But now it's very obvious. AmberSoler;60507
And in general, anyone whose current rating exceeds ten times their income is in the negative, and anyone whose rating is less than that is in the positive. Always.
Okay, let's leave it like this. AmberSoler;60507
But let's not talk about that now. Let's at least finish one question...
Which one? It seems like everything has already been decided. Let them enjoy it while their income doesn't exceed the threshold