Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

1. Let's assume Radik completed it in 17 days.
2. Dmitry in 24.
3. VDV in 24.

The number of players was the same, so as not to introduce bias in this parameter.
So, what are the results?

Dmitriy A S - 183.1
Radik - 193.9
VDV_forever - 160.7

It's unclear why a player with a low rating is performing well and increasing their rating. Does this happen in real life? In sports, for example? I'm not sure either, maybe you know?

Why are you only thinking about this now? A month ago, when you published your calculation mechanism, didn't this bother you? The rating should be calculated using a completely different scheme, not the one you initially started with... Or, let's give the winner 10 points instead of 100. Then the loser will receive 4 instead of 40 and will immediately start "performing well"...

And in general, those whose current rating exceeds ten times their income are at a disadvantage, and those whose rating does not exceed it are at an advantage. This is always the case with the current calculation system.

But let's not talk about that now. Let's at least finish one question...