What does good or bad mean? Everything is relative – compared to the other participants in the tournament, it's bad. Compared to someone who didn't play, it's good. The most important thing is that everyone received what they deserved at each moment in time. If there wasn't someone who finished in 8 days, and 40 points would only turn into 45, but if one of everyone who finished in 11 days was found, then 40 immediately turns into 56... which is quite different now... And all the credit goes to the oscillator! And if you only consider the first non-linear option, then it always has a simple 80 points and doesn't depend on the game of others...
And a super monster, even in the worst possible scenario for him, will hardly feel the loss. He'll even be amused by it :) This is with a 10% reduction. With a 1/3 reduction, he will have less reason to be amused :)
Added 8 minutes ago
What does good or bad mean? Everything is relative – compared to the other participants in the tournament, it's bad. Compared to someone who didn't play, it's good. The most important thing is that everyone received what they deserved at each moment in time. If there wasn't someone who finished in 8 days, and 40 points would only turn into 45, but if one of everyone who finished in 11 days was found, then 40 immediately turns into 56... which is quite different now... And all the credit goes to the oscillator. And if you only consider the first non-linear option, then it always has a simple 80 points and doesn't depend on the game of others...
:smile14: :smile14: :smile14:
You play today – for tomorrow... I play today – for the annual result... and I don't want to sit in front of the monitor and worry about missing the announcement of the next tournament, otherwise, what if I get adjusted, and I don't even know... And I also want to go on vacation for three weeks, but what if I miss two tournaments? and that's it... do you understand the difference in approach? why all this cosmic frenzy?! :)
I know that by playing one tournament a month and playing well, I can consistently compete for the rating, and if Vasya wants to break into the leaders, let him not wait for me to ruin the tournament, but learn to play! that's all.
I showed you an example when you didn't go anywhere and didn't miss the tournament announcement, but having a super-cool rating, you lost the tournament and ended up in last place! And you still don't want to spoil your annual rating :)
And in the case of a small rating, I don't understand at all, the guy completely failed, he's in last place, and the rating increases, not decreases, what a rating :)
Added 4 minutes ago
:smile14: :smile14: :smile14:
This is just while you haven't prepared your test table and calculated Radik and Dmitry :) But still, the questions I asked concern me and require a specific answer – why? :)