Skip to content

Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

User Avatar
#153
Auto-translated
IronAxe;60478
Who would even let them do that? There are administrative and forceful methods to put a stop to it, with the help of a coordinator. But even in that case, someone will still end up in last place. Or are you afraid that even in last place, a player will more than compensate for the aging penalty with a 10% bonus, and get a bigger increase than if they went to a weak tournament and took first place? Yes or no? I'm not really getting into the high-level details anymore.
It's difficult to more than compensate for the aging penalty... You've really stretched that point... I don't think it's worth delving into the details where, as I said, we might be digging in the wrong place... :) Let's see how the electorate reacts to what has already been presented. But if there are specific questions, there will be specific answers...

Added 2 minutes later
IronAxe;60480
And it's already beneficial for a weak player to be there. The aging penalty from their meager rating is negligible, and the bonus from the tournament's strength will definitely more than compensate for the loss.
I agree, there's a certain appeal to that - it's a kind of lure for the weak. Only you will later say that it's even more frustrating for the strong. They're already annoyed with their success, and now they're getting bonuses based on their rating...
Сначала было слово...
FizMiG v.2.0 *** Очередное обновление справочника! *** http://vk.com/fizmig