Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The table looks a bit messy. I think it would be better to use a chess-like plan – a total score between teams. For example, 6:0, and on the other side, 0:6, and so on, or 5:1 - 1:5. Otherwise, it's hard to understand. In this format, EACH game will contribute to the overall result. As it is now, you win two games, and the third game essentially doesn't matter. This removes the incentive to play it. Here!
And if it's 4-0, then 2 games are superfluous – the same applies in reverse. After 0-3 and 0-1 in the 2nd game, you can win 2-1. In any case, 2 wins out of 3 – 3 points, so there's no escaping the fact that you can pay for it by not considering possible equal results in the first, easy round.
I'm leaving my computer for 4 days, and then I'll fix everything in the tables.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...