Qwerty
Auto-translated
Because the main imbalance still lies in the amount of HP. Titans without the "ranged attack" skill deal no more damage than average level 6 troops. If the stats of black dragons are reduced to that of green dragons, they will still outperform all the others. But with a change in the growth rate, everything changes. Let's take a closer look at Nagan-4's expert assessment.
Here's what he writes: "The growth rate of dragons and phoenixes is the same, and 6 dragons will defeat 11 phoenixes or trade blows, which is also not in my favor."
"And then a secondary hero with 5 Black Dragons attacks me. Now I'm in shock; it turns out the Warlock built dragons as early as week 1, just to defend, buying only two. By week 131, Horn became a potential owner of 5 Black Dragons.
Later, he carefully moved around with two of them, just in case, fearing my attack from the shadows and keeping money for a ransom. Although, if the phoenixes had attacked, one would have definitely been taken out with the first blow.
The final battle was short.
Mine: Hero 7, 2, 2, 2. 8 phoenixes, 5 druids, 12 elves, 11 + 11 sprites.
Horn: Hero 1, 2, 2, 4, with artifacts. 5 Black Dragons, three level 1 gargoyles.
Of course, it would have been better to arrange the phoenixes as 1+7, but as we saw later, that wouldn't have saved him. The phoenixes took out one Black Dragon, and that one, with luck, retaliated - minus 4 phoenixes. That's it."
"Due to an incorrect assessment of the number of Black Dragons, I lost on day 135; with a more correct game, I could have prolonged it for about two weeks with the same result."
As Nagan-4 rightly writes - "with the same result." Let's see what would happen if the dragons' growth rate was 2 per week.
We won't discuss the specifics of the growth rate formulas now; we'll just conditionally state that Horn would have had 2, not 5, dragons. In this case, without a week of phoenixes, on the third week, Nagan-4 would have 3 phoenixes (it could have been 4). 4 phoenixes are definitely weaker than two black dragons, but not much weaker than two green dragons. And with a week of phoenixes, 8 phoenixes easily defeat two black dragons, and 11 phoenixes can fight against 4 black dragons.
Here's what he writes: "The growth rate of dragons and phoenixes is the same, and 6 dragons will defeat 11 phoenixes or trade blows, which is also not in my favor."
"And then a secondary hero with 5 Black Dragons attacks me. Now I'm in shock; it turns out the Warlock built dragons as early as week 1, just to defend, buying only two. By week 131, Horn became a potential owner of 5 Black Dragons.
Later, he carefully moved around with two of them, just in case, fearing my attack from the shadows and keeping money for a ransom. Although, if the phoenixes had attacked, one would have definitely been taken out with the first blow.
The final battle was short.
Mine: Hero 7, 2, 2, 2. 8 phoenixes, 5 druids, 12 elves, 11 + 11 sprites.
Horn: Hero 1, 2, 2, 4, with artifacts. 5 Black Dragons, three level 1 gargoyles.
Of course, it would have been better to arrange the phoenixes as 1+7, but as we saw later, that wouldn't have saved him. The phoenixes took out one Black Dragon, and that one, with luck, retaliated - minus 4 phoenixes. That's it."
"Due to an incorrect assessment of the number of Black Dragons, I lost on day 135; with a more correct game, I could have prolonged it for about two weeks with the same result."
As Nagan-4 rightly writes - "with the same result." Let's see what would happen if the dragons' growth rate was 2 per week.
We won't discuss the specifics of the growth rate formulas now; we'll just conditionally state that Horn would have had 2, not 5, dragons. In this case, without a week of phoenixes, on the third week, Nagan-4 would have 3 phoenixes (it could have been 4). 4 phoenixes are definitely weaker than two black dragons, but not much weaker than two green dragons. And with a week of phoenixes, 8 phoenixes easily defeat two black dragons, and 11 phoenixes can fight against 4 black dragons.
Орден Феникса – харизматический :) лидер
