Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I haven't heard from anyone else lately. It's not because the system has become so complex that people can't figure it out or don't want to.

I went to Moscow, and now I'm sitting here reading your discussion. I must say, you've developed the idea well and figured out what everyone is talking about.
Regarding your suggestions, I'll express my opinion.
1. I support aging by 1/10 per tournament.
And here's why. Let's take 2 players. 1 - won the first 2 tournaments and skipped the 3rd, 2 - played in all 3 tournaments, performing decently - 50 points per tournament. What do we have with aging at 1/3: the first has 111 points, and the second has 108 points.
And if the aging is 1/10: the first will have 171 points, and the second? - 135! This is a slightly fairer ratio.
2. Everything is clear here.
3. The oscillator is a rather ambiguous thing that can both add and subtract points. But I'm still for it.
4. I'm for a 100-point scale.
5. A minimum guaranteed rating is not needed.
6. As I understand it, this coefficient will increase the points for all participants in the tournament, including the winner => his point difference from everyone else will become even greater. What is the point of introducing it? How can this coefficient then, to quote: "somehow compensate for the imbalance caused by the appearance of a strong player in the tournament, who will significantly 'lower' the bar with his exceptionally strong performance...." If I misunderstood something about the coefficient, please explain.