One for all, and all for one!

The table looks a bit strange. I think it would be better to use a chess-like plan – a total score between teams. For example, 6:0, and on the other side, 0:6, and so on. Or 5:1 - 1:5. Otherwise, it's hard to understand. In this format, EVERY game will contribute to the overall result. As it is now, you win two games, and the third game essentially doesn't matter. This removes the incentive to play it. There!