Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

There are two players - A (rating 850) and B (rating 250). For a victory, A will receive 100. If B wins, he will also receive 100 (regardless of rating). BUT: as a result of the "aging" system, A will lose 85 in any case, and B will only lose 25. In total, A will earn 100-85=15 points in the best-case scenario, and B will earn 100-25=75 points in the best-case scenario. This is what I call a greater burden for the leader... :)

Indeed, it's not a leader's job to calculate ratings... We have more important things to do... Let those, whatever you call them... the moderators... calculate... yes, yes...

Then it's simpler not to overcomplicate things, but to post the results of the last tournament each time as the current rating. This will be the most realistic... If you want to be in the TOP, win every tournament... And if you don't play, you won't be there... This will be the most accurate reflection of your position. Why have "aging" at all?