Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I think this system was discussed, and AlexPank rejected it. It's hard to tell who will drop out – inactive players or a weak player who scores 2 points in 10 tournaments (20/10=2). But an inactive player will stay at the top for a long time (100/1=100). So, let's adjust the coefficient so that a player with two points is satisfied and surpasses the inactive player.

Okay :) So, for now, let's adopt a decay of 1/10 for each tournament that passes... Whether they play or not doesn't matter. In half a year, the rating will be halved, so inactive players will naturally drop down... But, this is the current rating, which is not subject to any rewards at the end of the period... And it will only be used to identify active players, to create a current TOP-10, for example, and to calculate the qualification coefficient for each tournament.

This coefficient will affect the number of rating points for a tournament for each player who participated in that tournament. How will it affect it? I think simply by increasing it proportionally. So, the maximum for a tournament will ultimately be not 100 points, but 100*k, where k=sum.av(TOP5)/sum.av(ALL).

Now, let's estimate how much this coefficient will be if everyone who participated in BB plays in the next tournament. So, k=72/38=1.895. Hmm... it distorts things a lot... although the distortion is only now, because there is too much variance based on just one tournament. Over time, this coefficient will approach one, so we can leave it as a standby idea, and we'll see... By the way, I would like to note that this will be a solution to the problem of a strong player appearing in a tournament, who will lower the bar with their performance... The stronger the players, the higher the compensation... and everything is interconnected, and there isn't a single coefficient pulled out of thin air... which is pleasing... :)

I'm just gathering thoughts and ideas... Otherwise, they're just engaging in sophistry :)