Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

No problem. We already have a ranking of 26 players... Let's see what we can do with a real example, not a virtual one... Question: which scale should we use? 1-100 or 1-50? In essence, there is no difference, only 1-100 is more convenient and clear (psychologically more familiar and directly related to percentages), in 1-50 you would have to enter decimal digits after the comma, which I would not like. I suggest 1-100. I think no one will object...

I don't mind 100, it's easier to calculate that way. But shouldn't we still leave two decimal places, if you say it could be 0.05?

I suggest moving all three results from the normal difficulty without coefficients to the impossible difficulty. Their save wasn't easier. We've already figured that out.

I don't mind, what does VDV say? And we need to agree on the fact that all Tournaments should be at the same level. I, for example, understand that the saves weren't easier, I argued with Raper to defend the system, which still has flaws, BUT try to prove it to those they will beat in the impossible difficulty :) That is, if next time someone again hosts a tournament at different levels :) What will you do? In any case, calculate the results according to your formula and send it to VDV. Let him think for himself :) Tell him that I don't mind. I don't even mind if you take on calculating the rankings, I can help or substitute :) Because in complex formulas, I will already start floundering like in a triathlon :) And that's not good for me - you've seen that I'm Iron :) in the avatar :) Yes, and a paddle without a rowing part, sharpened :)