Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

That's what I'm saying – it's all about the coefficient again. Perhaps it's the strength of the tournament, based on the CURRENT player ratings, which no one has yet.

For now, we can assume that all players have the same rating, and therefore the coefficient for each tournament is standard... Over time, criteria will accumulate, and the rating from tournament to tournament will begin to acquire some kind of gradation... so this is not a problem.

The comparison isn't quite appropriate; they're not swimming or racing, but clicking the mouse and keyboard, using their brains, closer to chess.

I'm just saying that if I don't play HMM II, and you don't play HMM III, then I don't care how our ratings compare in terms of strength. We don't have the opportunity to check this under equal conditions (on the same board). Would a chess player be interested in the ratings of checkers players if they don't play checkers themselves? No, they wouldn't...