kalababa
Auto-translated
Thank you to everyone who shared their opinions. After some thought, I came to the conclusion that the optimal system for choosing a castle would be the following:
We have 3 coalitions, and therefore 3 draws (draw for good vs. evil, good vs. neutral, neutral vs. evil). Each player needs to play 1 match to 2 wins against each team, except their own. After the draw, each player writes down their "field" - a template and the castle they will play with (and most likely writes to me in ICQ, otherwise the last one to write in the pair will have an advantage). As soon as both players have written down their "field," I will publish this information. On the "opponent's field," the player can choose 1 out of the 2 remaining castles. If the score in the series becomes 1-1, then it will be necessary to play another game with the remaining castles and with a classic template. As a result, if all teams have the same number of players, a player will play a minimum of 4 games - a maximum of 6. If the teams are unequal, some may have to play more games. These are my thoughts.
We have 3 coalitions, and therefore 3 draws (draw for good vs. evil, good vs. neutral, neutral vs. evil). Each player needs to play 1 match to 2 wins against each team, except their own. After the draw, each player writes down their "field" - a template and the castle they will play with (and most likely writes to me in ICQ, otherwise the last one to write in the pair will have an advantage). As soon as both players have written down their "field," I will publish this information. On the "opponent's field," the player can choose 1 out of the 2 remaining castles. If the score in the series becomes 1-1, then it will be necessary to play another game with the remaining castles and with a classic template. As a result, if all teams have the same number of players, a player will play a minimum of 4 games - a maximum of 6. If the teams are unequal, some may have to play more games. These are my thoughts.
