Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
Perhaps we should differentiate between RANKING – which depends only on the speed of completion – and GRAILS – which depend on the number of participants, and which can also be spent on the doll?
For now, that's what needs to be done, and we should start calculating and taking into account the current player rankings. It's too early to talk about championship rankings and annual rankings when no one has any ranking at all. But the formula for calculating the ranking will still need to be improved, and I already said that AmberSoler set the direction. It is well suited for awarding Grails. So that the underdogs don't complain about a pittance :) And it all depends on the number of people and also on the place. But why calculate the Annual game ranking specifically for those who participated in the Kenigam tournament? Wouldn't it be better to start with the Current ranking for all players on the portal? We need to refine Amber's formula; it's more complex than mine, so we need to think about it more carefully. I explained what personally doesn't suit me in a rather simple example.