You yourself explained in previous posts why aging the rating five times a year by 1/8 is unacceptable.
:) It feels like we're on different planets. :)
Please read carefully what others are writing.
And aging this rating by 1/2... after the new year so that the leaders don't get complacent.
1. Current rating. It is indefinite and never reset. The only feature is that old results are aged to reflect the current state of affairs. To avoid the Korean nuances you were talking about.
2. Rating (cup, championship, etc.) for a specified period (year, season, month). Here, aging does not occur. The result accumulates during the period, after which the results are summarized and reset for the next start. The start is from scratch.
I'm talking about the second option. And you about which one?
