Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

What prevents us from doing this? We take one rating system, agree on it, offer a ready and refined project to the organizer, get approval or feedback, correct it – and that’s it... It takes just a couple of days. Why are we constantly saying "we should, we should..."? :) If the rating system we are discussing in this thread gets its final form, what prevents us from applying it in VDV Tournaments, starting with the one that just took place?... We are not dogmatic, and we don't need to sign any papers, apparently... :)
All that is needed is a show of will, and we have that...

There are many inconsistencies here.
1. I disagree with artificially boosting the rating of someone who doesn't deserve that level. Because in VDV tournaments, a player using "oil" and other exploits will receive additional rewards for it, and they will also get a free rating boost.
2. If VDV or someone else decides to hold tournaments again at different difficulty levels, you disagree with the coefficients and didn't offer your own.
3. The rating decay is designed to automatically remove players who are only active for a short time or those who haven't played in any tournaments on this platform for a long time. The decay period can also be discussed, but you seem to be completely against decay. The rating can't always be increasing for everyone. A rating is a rating because it goes up and down for each player depending on their activity and results in tournaments.

And I also didn't understand the latest changes in your calculation system, regarding the fact that the second component in the second calculation option, depending on the place taken, will not have such a strong influence on the rating (at least I showed that it has a much stronger influence than the component in the first option). You could recalculate that same silly example of mine and show on the example how it will look.
The example may be silly, but it clearly shows what it was supposed to show