Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

The topic is about ranking. Scores and Grails are irrelevant.

I completely agree, but we should also remove a few starting saves and leave only one. :)

Voting is the easiest thing to do. But have you thought about what we'll get in the end? ;)

My suggestion is this: set a minimum rating of 20 (or 10). Everything above that is a progressive scale, increasing from last place to first. The calculation mechanism is secondary. The main thing is that the essence is not distorted too much - such a rating will guarantee a minimum number of points even just for participation, which is important, and also reflect the number of participants in the tournament on the winner's result.

2. VDV_forever's rating has one very significant drawback - the minimum number of points must be significant, because even the last place in the table should bring a tangible (moral) result... Let's say 50 people played in the tournament. 2/3 of them will get a rating of 1. And those who didn't play will get a rating of 0. Is that a big difference? And was it worth the effort? :)