Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
I'm already starting to get confused about what we're discussing here. Whether it's about calculating player ratings or awarding Grail points. These two issues should have been separated into two different topics.
To be honest, I don't see any drawbacks in IronAxe's player rating system, if we remove the aging mechanic.
As for awarding Grail points, the optimal option, in my opinion, is VDV_forever's proposal.
P.S. 284 views and 16 votes. The voter turnout is slightly more than 5% - so the election would be deemed invalid :D. Is it really that hard for them to vote?