Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Or there won't be anyone in the final... Couldn't they have anticipated the many difficulties beforehand and not imposed any restrictions, only to later have to cancel them?..
I wrote this in light of the fact that we shouldn't come up with additional prize pools for those types of tournaments where there might be few participants.AmberSoler;59801
And there will be no need to invent anything. But the idea that the outcome should definitely depend on the number of participants is correct, in my opinion...
I agree with the organization you proposed; it could work that way too. But if there are only 2 participants in one of the stages, on what