Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The point is that not all players play ALL versions of Heroes. It would be unfair to deprive such players of the opportunity to earn grail points. I am most looking forward to the opinion of the tournament organizers and coordinators – so that we can decide what and how to count right away, and not during the tournament.
Then there should be no additional funds at all. Otherwise, look at what happens. First, you say that the VDV system for awarding grail points is not very suitable because it does not take into account the number of participants in tournaments. Now you are proposing a system that will take this into account, and then you realize that in some version of the game, only 2 people will participate, they will receive a meager amount, although they could have defeated a thousand participants, but there are simply none, and you propose to introduce additional funds to add prize grail points to such participants.
Have you seen a cat chasing its tail? Does this remind you of anything? :)
1. Take the VDV system.
2. Introduce a scale for awarding points based on the number of participants.
3. No compensation if there are few people in the tournament for a particular version.
Why should organizers artificially raise the status of one of the game versions?