Skip to content

Sacred Haven of Debauchery

User Avatar
#50632
Auto-translated
There is no flame there.
25 points for the first insult – that’s unfair. Because there is no insult there. That is, formally there is, but I would adhere to the logic that Major Vortex described a long time ago – to ask the opinion of the potential offended party, whether such words are offensive to them. I don’t think that Amko takes those words of Mortulus seriously as an insult, just as I don’t think that Sat had the motivation to offend Amarant.
So, out of those four violations, only one is justified.
Because the last one was about you, and the other one wasn’t?
Of course, everything else can be attributed to “jokes,” but that’s just an excuse. It’s just wrong to write
No. Violations for flame have nothing to do with reality.
in relation to
I would have taken her and beaten her.
Such things must be assessed from a neutral position, and not waved away every time.


Барон
"Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!