Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Amko, your post is predictable.
For example, I would easily vote against you, Wulf, and Henri. But Tox joined late, and I won't try to save a player who doesn't care.
Therefore, only those with negative intentions can latch onto what Tox wrote and develop the idea. Because, for the most part (in v1d), the peaceful players execute other peaceful players – this is a well-known fact.
But I would listen to you after the night, if we survive.)
Added 10 minutes ago Kalipso
I know, and I want him to know too.
If you are a peaceful player, and you call yourself a "warrior" to the commissioner for verification, there is a high probability that the mafia will go to you. They probably know that you are a peaceful player and, in fact, verified (as if you have been checked), so you are not needed. Thus, you ruin the verification. I don't think a peaceful player would call the commissioner to themselves. Why would they, when they can send him to another player (a suspect) and get more than two "warrior" votes?
So yes, I'm including you in the list
Все псы попадают в рай
Какие бы законы мы не писали, нас все равно расстреляют, если мы проиграем эту войну.