Forum

So, you deliberately prioritize your own opinion over others?

Personally, for myself – undoubtedly.

Every other opinion is checked for its validity, after which it either becomes mine, or is discarded as nonsense, or is put on the back burner (if its validity is unclear).

and you also automatically define it as hostile. Surprisingly! Couldn't it be friendly? And more accurate than my own?

Some can be, some cannot.

The opinion that you express is encouraged to spread precisely by those organizations that you describe. You yourself define them as unfriendly; the first step has been taken, and now it remains to understand what benefit they derive from having such an opinion in your consciousness, and then to see how they lobby it in the mass consciousness.

Following your logic, one should never be guided by the hostile, speculative opinion of one's parents, but instead, from the moment of birth, have one's own, of course, non-speculative opinion, right?

The opinion of one's parents is definitely not inherently hostile, but it should be checked for its validity in relation to oneself and the objective situation. And the older you get, the more you need to check.

But if we go deeper, this opinion is also based on someone else's opinion, and in an absolute sense, it is not yours – it is formed by your past lives, your communication, your qualities, which determine your psychophysical attitude towards certain people, information, events, and the danger of a person putting their own opinion first and evaluating everything else in relation to it lies in the fact that
our feelings are not perfect, as a result of which a huge amount of information that corresponds to reality will be perceived by us as erroneous simply because it does not correspond to our own ideas.

Well, of course, my opinion is based on something; it would be strange to deny the wisdom accumulated by humanity. But that doesn't make it any less mine.

This is the psychology of a proud person, and a proud person is a stupid person, because pride destroys all the fruits of asceticism, it destroys everything.

This is a very superficial judgment. Like any general phenomenon, pride has both advantages and disadvantages.

Although I don't quite understand what pride has to do with it; in my opinion, some other word should have been used, but that's not the point.

I write about what interests me and what might be interesting and useful to others, well, at least I try.

This is a commendable desire; the topics being discussed are quite relevant.

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, but I have the feeling that your task is not to analyze, not to understand, but to prove that you understand everything better than me :)

No, it's not about proving anything... rather, it's about knocking you off your high horse + slowing down the spread of the infection. You were simply retransmitting several propaganda theses, both in terms of content and form, which is why I got riled up and launched a counter-wave.

But where there is your own text – not chanting slogans, but some kind of reflection and reasoning – I don't have any particular negativity towards it. I liked the Eastern story.

I will only add that information about 90 million people is classified information of the Civil Registry Office of the Russian Federation for official use, and the Civil Registry Office is the place where all deaths and births are recorded.

References to some kind of classified information in such discussions are not very appropriate. If it is presented, it should be in the form of "rumors have it that...", and not as a statement of fact.

and why do I have a hysterical form, manner of presentation? what does this consist of? + there is no task to scare anyone, there is a task not to be in ignorance, to keep people in which there is always a task of the state

Your texts put pressure on emotions, on the subconscious. This is how propaganda works. I, on the other hand, try to put pressure on logic, on the analysis of the situation and the development of a holistic vision.