Forum

I thought that knowledgeable people have long been aware that it is a forgery, specifically a reprint with compilation errors from the novel "The Eternal Call." Allen Dulles himself was a very intelligent man and would never have written anything like that.

I also haven't heard from people I trust anything about the authenticity of the so-called "Protocols of the Elders of Zion."

And what people and what sources do you trust?
A huge number of sources speak about these protocols, for example, General Petrov, whom they recently eliminated.

We haven't heard about many things, don't know about them, and don't even suspect them.

Just read them yourself if you can find them (if you're interested), they contain amazing paragraphs – about how they would implement their plans and, through the media, deceitfully convince everyone that it is all a forgery, that it is all slander, that there are no Protocols of the Elders of Zion, that there is no Harvard Project, that it is all a fabrication intended to tarnish their good name.

But, despite all this, the most surprising thing is that everything written there has been implemented point by point in the past and is being implemented now.

The technology of discrediting the existence of these very protocols and their involvement in them is described in detail there.

If they developed such a "grand" project, then what prevents them from creating plausible legends about the fact that there are no protocols or projects, that it is all the machinations of ill-wishers aimed at tarnishing their bright name and intentions, legends about the fact that they, as a Hasidic-Paramasonic group, are not involved in these protocols and projects, that it is all unauthoritative and no one is doing anything based on them.

Do you think they are fools? They are far from fools; they are simply demonic personalities by nature. To act so treacherously as they do is their nature.

Thomas Aquinas (a companion of Christ) is recognized even by the modern Russian Orthodox Church (although, in my opinion, this in itself is not a criterion of truth), which almost doesn't recognize anything, neither the Gospel of Origen (which contains knowledge about karma and reincarnation), nor the Gospel of the Essenes (a community of healers in which Christ grew up).

In his demonology, a complete classification of demonic entities (succubi, incubi, siphs, and phophs, etc.) is given (their methods of action, their goals, and their motives); he also writes that not knowing this or thinking that it does not exist is complete ignorance.

And what is "the Russian people" in general, and what makes them so special among others, that they deserve this?

They are not special; what makes a person special is not their nationality, not their skin color, but their character traits.

"The Russian people" are the Slavs; this includes Serbs, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Nenets, Evenks, Buryats, Khanty, and other small ethnic groups – they are carriers of a certain culture.

But the "Russian people" are far from the only ones destined to be erased from the face of the earth, and they deserve this, just like other peoples:

because they do not fit into the "Theory of the Golden Billion."

because they are carriers of a culture alien to them; culture is a vessel necessary to preserve and transmit knowledge.

because people who have a culture and knowledge are more difficult to control, more difficult to lead to the brink, to dangle a carrot (in the form of the Olympics, etc.) in front of their noses.

It is much easier to control ignorant people.

Therefore, they are destroying culture (its carriers), destroying universal values in order to turn us into Ivan the Fool, who has no memory of his roots, to reduce a person to the level of an animal so that he lives only for sleep, sex, food, and defense and thinks that this is how it should be, so that he doesn't even know that it is possible to live differently.

Added 1 hour 24 minutes ago

This is definitely better than if the criterion of truth in the system of priorities is someone else's opinion. Especially if this opinion is knowingly hostile to you.

...................

So, you knowingly put your own opinion above someone else's? And you also knowingly define it as hostile. Amazing! Can it not be friendly? And more truthful than my own?

Following your logic, one should never be guided by the hostile, speculative opinion of one's parents, but should have one's own opinion from birth, of course, a non-speculative one, right?

And if you go deeper, this opinion is also based on someone else's opinion, and in an absolute sense, it is not yours – it is formed by your past lives, your communication, your qualities, which determine your psychophysiological attitude towards certain people, information, events.

And the danger of a person putting their own opinion first and evaluating everything else in relation to it lies in the fact that our feelings are not perfect, as a result of which a huge amount of information corresponding to reality will be perceived by us as erroneous simply because it does not correspond to our own ideas.

This is the psychology of a proud person, and a proud person is a stupid person, because pride destroys all the fruits of asceticism, it destroys everything.

=======================================================================
Eastern story about suras and asuras, divine and demonic natures (from French: nature – nature):
5 thousand years ago, there was a single empire of Maha-Bharata, one king, one hymn, one flag, one law.
At that time, the martial arts teacher Dronacharya was very famous; the children of kings and the children of all vassal kings studied with him. Yudhisthira (the personification of virtue), the eldest son of Pandu, and Duryodhana (the personification of evil), the eldest son of Dhritarashtra (the blind king who took the throne instead of Pandu, who died in the forest), all of Drona's students asked him why he wanted Yudhisthira, not Duryodhana, to become the future king. Then Drona summoned Duryodhana and told him to go to the city and find at least one person equal to himself. Duryodhana went in search and returned very pleased.
Drona: Well, did you find at least one person equal to yourself?
Duryodhana: No.
Drona: Does everyone think they are better than you?
Duryodhana: What are you talking about?! Everyone is some kind of pig! Wherever I look, there is some kind of shortcoming.
Then Drona summoned Yudhisthira and asked him to find at least one person equal to him. Yudhisthira returned with his head bowed.
Drona: Well, did you find at least one person equal to yourself?
Yudhisthira: No.
Drona: Does everyone think they are worse?
Yudhisthira: What are you talking about? Everyone is better than me.
=======================================================================

___
I write about what interests me and what might be interesting and useful to others; at least, I try to.

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that your task is not to analyze, not to understand, but to prove that you understand everything better than me.

__________

I don't have the strength to answer anymore today.

I will only write that the information about 90 million people is classified information of the Civil Registry Office of the Russian Federation for official use, and the Civil Registry Office is the place where all deaths and births are recorded.

And why do I have a hysterical form, a manner of presentation? What does this consist of? + there is no task to scare anyone; there is a task not to be in ignorance, to keep people out of it, which is always the task of the state.