Skip to content
User Avatar
#2925
Auto-translated
ariputra
Of course it's bad, because someone has to help you :) but since your own opinion stands first in your system of priority criteria for the truth of anything, then you are right—it's unlikely anyone will help in this case.
This is definitely better than if someone else's opinion were the criterion of truth in a priority system. Especially if that opinion belongs to people who are known to be hostile to you.
only someone can help, but the person themselves must simply want to be helped ;-)
That is for sure.
what I am writing are not my speculative conclusions—this is documentary information that is hidden and kept silent in every way, as it is unprofitable and dangerous for those who stand at the feeding trough.
The trouble is precisely that you are writing speculative conclusions. Not your own, of course. To see this, look, for example, at your initial post. Simple googling of statistics shows that you've exaggerated significantly. The number of abortions per year is something like 1.2-1.5M (versus your 8), and the number of drug addicts according to various estimates ranges from 500K to 2M (versus your 10); I don't remember about homeless children, but even in the 90s it didn't reach 4M, and certainly not now. And the total population is also fake; you should at least know that if you are reasoning on such topics.

Here and hereafter, I am providing figures from memory; real ones may differ, but likely not by much.

Essentially, after this, one can stop reading all your further reasonings and reasonably assume that they are based on sources of similar reliability, and furthermore seasoned with your own hysteria. Which, as is known, greatly hinders sound analysis and increases susceptibility to various scare stories.
First of all, where from, on what basis did you take that this is a "hoax"? what are the sources?
Since you made the leak, it's up to you to prove it and provide sources. For some reason, I am sure you won't find anything more serious than yellow press.
Secondly, have you read the Harvard project? The Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
I have. See the conclusion above and below in the text.
what is written there—is currently being implemented point by point not only in Russia but also in other countries of the world, but specifically Russia at this moment is the central bridgehead, and vaccination (official name - prevention of cervical cancer) — which they want to and will implement and which leads to infertility - is a sad reality.
I remember coming across a similar text of "plans for world conquest" for analysis, allegedly dated back to the 70s. I don't know if I can find the link to my analysis now, but it argued convincingly that this text was written no earlier than 2000. That is, even if some original source of a similar nature existed, it was substantially reworked later, based on what actually happened. In short, they twisted reality to fit their desires.

A similar story applies to various Protocols and other conspiracy literature—they are relevant only at the moment of their publication, but 10 years before or 10 years after them, they look ridiculous even to people not very well-versed in the matter.
Thirdly, where did you get that the so-called Committee 300, or the Hasidic-Freemason group, which actually currently holds power in America, England, France, Germany will give up their plans in Africa, Syria, Iran, and finally Russia???
Many analysts argue about the structure of this group. And very different opinions exist. The interpretation you've provided belongs to the radical wing of opinions. There are also well-founded opinions that such groups (with the specified level of influence) do not exist, and what is happening logically follows from objective laws of economics and mass psychology. As usual, the truth will be somewhere in the middle.
+ For these "people" human life is pfft, their goal is power over the globe, which they specifically need for the redistribution of resources, and they will not stop at a price of 1000 or 100 thousand, a million, or 100 million human lives.
Who are you trying to surprise with this? The cult of the value of human life is only a few decades old, and it's a big question whether it is an achievement of civilization or a side effect of its development. Opinions on this matter diverge. But generally, they agree that in the near future, this cult will decline.

History has seen even greater victims (in percentage terms). For instance, in China in the 2nd or 3rd century after a series of wars, the population decreased from ~60 million to ~8 million, meaning by 86%. And nothing, they somehow survived. If modern conspiracy theorists had existed then, imagine what they would have cooked up... while historians describe this as a consequence of objective economic and demographic laws.
Fourthly, you say that vaccination for the purpose of infertility turned out to be ineffective - where did this information come from?
Simple common sense is enough here to understand that even if 50% of the population were vaccinated, the remaining 50% would easily fill the demographic gap. And where they wouldn't, it would be compensated by migration from areas unaffected by vaccination or from other states.

Basically, in all living beings, reproductive capabilities significantly exceed the objective need to maintain numbers. The Americans learned this fact through personal experience, which is why they abandoned attempts to control population size by this method, at least on a mass scale.

Again, there are enough competent microbiologists worldwide now, so sooner or later any biological aggression will be detected.
Fifthly, genetic engineering used for military purposes does not stand still.
Well it doesn't, what then? Analysis methods also don't stand still. And catching a hostile microbe and isolating its carrier from society is purely technologically much easier than developing that microbe.
Sixthly, the vast majority of mass media are in their hands, they organize everything so cleverly that you, I, everyone thinks that they have wound down and no longer conduct any experiments, but why would they stop them? they fear a fuss, considering that television, radio and newspapers are in their hands.
Control through the same media is definitely very strong. And it's exactly there that I see the main danger; the technique of conducting information wars is currently experiencing rapid growth, methods of attack and defense are improving before our eyes, roughly like tanks-planes in the 30s/40s.

People who express thoughts like yours are victims of this very information war. In about 20 years, when the concept of consciousness hygiene reaches the broad masses, the public will only wonder how stupid the previous generation was.
in this case their goal is not to make money, why would they need that if the Federal Reserve System of America - an LLC with a share capital of 200 million dollars printing hundreds of trillions of dollars is in their (Rothschilds, DuPonts) hands? why should they earn from some vaccines? there are now more than 10 times as many dollars circulating worldwide as all goods combined.
First of all, I meant the earnings of local vaccine manufacturers.

Secondly, they can print any number of dollars only in theory; in practice, there are limitations, both procedural and based on common sense. Therefore, if there is an opportunity to suck out a few billion greenbacks through traditional means, they don't refuse it.

Essentially, the crisis is the clogging of economic capillaries with various debris and as a result the need for constant large-scale emissions that threaten to overturn the entire financial pyramid. The demiurges get little joy from these emissions—just one big headache.
The goal in this case is to reduce the population of Russia to 15 million people and make the territory of Russia a raw material appendage, while the remaining 15 million people will work in this resource-extracting industry and live in reservations like Indians now do in North America.
If such a goal existed, it would have been easily realized in the 90s when Russia was in a deep knockdown. But since they didn't realize it, but on the contrary, poured in many billions of humanitarian aid and left nuclear weapons :eek: (aren't they idiots :confused:), then the goals are some other ones.
Putin and Medvedev are appointees of the world government who dance to their tune and at this moment are the main actors in the implementation of the Harvard project to plunder Russia.
They were bought for power, for money, for fear.
Alas, you are wrong here, and quite significantly.

I don't know how it actually stands myself, but I am sure that my interpretation is much closer to the truth than yours. I won't tell it yet; first try to digest simpler material higher up in the text.

I'm kind of tired of commenting now, maybe I'll continue later. Or maybe I won't, after all, further down the text you mostly repeat the first half.