Let me explain where in the post it says: "What could prevent Tinker from winning fairly? I don't think anyone doubts that he is a strong enough player and doesn't need map hacks," - and I wrote about him, is there a reference to streams?

OK, I'll explain it slowly and clearly:
1) Some people said that it would be good for Tinker to play a game and record it for a stream.
2) Then these same people will watch this stream and draw some conclusions.
3) Presumably, they were hoping that Tinker would show the full depth of his noobishness in the stream, and this would be proof that he is a cheater.

I hope this is clear so far?

4) I said that such a stream would not be proof of anything, simply because Tinker is likely to win anyway, after all, he is not a noob.

The fact that the word "stream" was not explicitly used in the post does not mean that I was talking out of thin air. It was a response within the framework of the previous discussion.

It turns out that you are saying, "I don't get involved, but I draw my own conclusions." Very clever approach))) And most importantly - it's correct!!!:D :D :D
There is such an expression: "there are two opinions: mine and the wrong one"... But it is not suitable for constructive solutions. You could have understood it already...

Did I ever claim to be offering a constructive solution? Even now - did I ever claim to be offering a solution at all? I think I explained quite clearly that this is your war, not mine. Whatever decision is made, that's what it will be. I won't complain either way.