Neoandy
Auto-translated
We spoke with Maretti today. Regarding the Chinese player, we came to the following.
On HeroesWorld, players who have lodged complaints about his games will clearly and definitively formulate those complaints, preferably point by point. Then, as Sticky indicated, he will translate them for the Chinese player and receive explanations from him for each point. After analyzing both sides, the remaining participants will make one of three decisions:
1. If they are convinced of unfair play — a ban.
2. If they are convinced of fair play — he continues playing, and on HeroesWorld it will be noted that he is an honest player.
3. If they are convinced of neither the first nor the second, the Chinese player will be required to stream all his subsequent games in the tournament, starting before the map generation moment (it will also be possible to check network settings for a home network). True, Maretti has some concerns that there may be issues with streaming for Chinese players due to some kind of censorship (this will be clarified).
P.S.: In general, I think option No. 3 should be considered and adopted into the arsenal for combating unfair play. After all, it will not be uncommon for there to be doubts about honesty, but not quite enough for a clear map hack accusation. Applying option No. 3 would provide a response from the judges (the Arbitration Committee or similar bodies), and the player would understand that he is under scrutiny (if he was cheating, it's time to stop). Plus, judges won't have to get their hands dirty in dubious situations, and players will be protected from map hacking to some extent.
Therefore, Javdet and Gomunguls — it's up to you. If needed, I have save files of the Chinese player's games with Maretti.
On HeroesWorld, players who have lodged complaints about his games will clearly and definitively formulate those complaints, preferably point by point. Then, as Sticky indicated, he will translate them for the Chinese player and receive explanations from him for each point. After analyzing both sides, the remaining participants will make one of three decisions:
1. If they are convinced of unfair play — a ban.
2. If they are convinced of fair play — he continues playing, and on HeroesWorld it will be noted that he is an honest player.
3. If they are convinced of neither the first nor the second, the Chinese player will be required to stream all his subsequent games in the tournament, starting before the map generation moment (it will also be possible to check network settings for a home network). True, Maretti has some concerns that there may be issues with streaming for Chinese players due to some kind of censorship (this will be clarified).
P.S.: In general, I think option No. 3 should be considered and adopted into the arsenal for combating unfair play. After all, it will not be uncommon for there to be doubts about honesty, but not quite enough for a clear map hack accusation. Applying option No. 3 would provide a response from the judges (the Arbitration Committee or similar bodies), and the player would understand that he is under scrutiny (if he was cheating, it's time to stop). Plus, judges won't have to get their hands dirty in dubious situations, and players will be protected from map hacking to some extent.
Therefore, Javdet and Gomunguls — it's up to you. If needed, I have save files of the Chinese player's games with Maretti.