Anti-cheat recipe.
Every participant of a match (of any tournament) MUST...
turns into
What's next? I'm talking about minimizing risks - some people don't have two computers and we'll exclude that segment this way.
which is not the same thing, but by substituting concepts we keep asserting further. You can do this like in a children's fairy tale: swap a cow for a goat, and a goat for a duck, and keep swapping until you get a beating from the grandma :D
Asm wants to do a lot of things.
Also, Asm should:
There is no monetary support from BT for Asm. So what do you want, Comrade Neo, huh?
Or did I demand something from Asm somewhere? :eek:
Because talking shit is easier than hauling sacks...
P.S.: although in fact, as a rule, people get paid more for the ability to talk shit than for the ability to haul sacks :D
The court evaluates the evidence... and how it is presented... whether logic or emotion, it doesn't really matter... the parties present evidence (materials)... so the main thing is the presence of these materials... and the form of presentation... is just a form...
Did you just imagine all that to yourself?
I think most people here will tell you that the form of presentation matters for achieving results. Otherwise, the legal profession wouldn't be needed. You could just send a pile of papers (evidence) in an envelope, and the court would of course figure out themselves what and, most importantly, on what basis (form of presentation) they are proving.
Take my word for it, if you give the same set of evidence for similar cases to different lawyers, their results will far from always be the same.