Турниры HeroesWorld Cup & World Cup - 2012

It seems to me that the controversial situation reached a dead end precisely because of the intervention of a "guru in retirement."

And where would it have gone without my intervention? And yes, why doesn't street magic work on Tinker's task?

Timeline:

It almost sounds like a compliment... I certainly didn't intend anything like that, but if it creates that impression, it means that the skills of manipulating public opinion are already working at a subconscious level.

Note how Vik's posts differ from all other players:
The rest put sincerity into their lines: you read them and immediately feel that the person cares about the discussion. And only one writes as if he is proving a mathematical theorem, coldly, dryly, and impassively. The logical content is excellent.

And? Is that a bad thing? On the contrary, that's exactly how controversial episodes should be analyzed.

Let me remind you that in jurisprudence in general and in judging in particular, logic is primary, and ethics are only involved where logical analysis shows the existence of several legitimate options, between which a choice must be made.

If a judge makes a decision based on arguments like "he's a cool guy," then what's the point of having such a judge?