Pit for LM
Auto-translated
So, since Pit has no complaints about the games, but suspicious saves from these same games are being posted??? Who decided to look at saves that have no complaints and weave them into the discussion.
The judges receive complaints about a certain player and start reviewing all of their saves in a row. I always do the same. For example, with RBV. As a result of the search, saves with cheating in the tournament on the Portal were found. Look in the AK thread. At that time, Psikh also had no complaints. Many people don't analyze their opponent's play. But just because there are no complaints, the cheating usually doesn't disappear.
Here in the tournament, there were complaints about the first round. The judges considered them insufficient. Sticky asked me about one of the saves. I replied that I had no reasonable explanation and that we should ask Rebelli what he was guided by. Further, ideally, the saves with the Pole should have been analyzed. What difficulties there were in obtaining these saves, I don't know. Look, I asked, and Rebelli immediately posted them. As I understand now, no one looked at them. Then I played. The saves of my games are on HeroesWorld. At that time, there were 13 or 16 views. I didn't judge my own games, but there are other judges besides me. Naturally, they were interested in the player whose games were in question.
Sticky asked me. I think self-quoting does not violate the confidentiality of personal correspondence.
StickyFingaz 28/05/2012 17:58
haven't you looked at the saves?
Pit 28/05/2012 18:00
I looked
Pit 28/05/2012 18:00
but it's hard to find anything there
Pit 28/05/2012 18:00
two games are very short
Pit 28/05/2012 18:01
and on Jebus Cross, I don't know, there's really nowhere to go
...
Pit 28/05/2012 18:02
I don't really have the mood to analyze when it's a loss
I know who found those Pandoras in my games. Sticky asked me about them back then.
Pit 28/05/2012 23:04
maybe he can determine the inside contents by the guard?
Pit 28/05/2012 23:04
I can't
Pit 28/05/2012 23:05
I pick empty ones(
...
Pit 28/05/2012 23:07
well, I can definitely determine a Pandora for gold (for 5k), that's not a problem
Pit 28/05/2012 23:07
for 2 magic value 7500
Pit 28/05/2012 23:07
for 5k experience 6500
Pit 28/05/2012 23:07
in principle, who knows
Pit 28/05/2012 23:07
also for level 1 creatures, also 7500
Where I feel guilty is that I removed myself from this matter. I should have helped Sticky, not with judging, but simply shared my experience so that the decision-making would be more justified and, so to speak, more legitimate. Everything happened too quickly. And I like to think for a very long time to avoid making mistakes.
Neo, I wrote to you a week ago about moving me to the upper bracket:
Pit (09:26:11 3/06/2012)
it's still probably not right
we should have left it as is, just disqualify Reba in both parts of the bracket
Sticky decided it wouldn't be right to leave you without an opponent and immediately advance you to Maretti, especially considering your role in banning Rebelli. You would have looked funny.
Well, I'm glad you decided to
1. Put the mudslinging aside.
I assume that regarding point
4. Restore the tournament standings to the moment of Reba's disqualification, and then let each participant decide for themselves what to do next without pressuring the Org.
About the tournament. What cares and tasks await the org?
A review of the Rebelli case. Specifically a review — with a full analysis of the saves of all games, discussion, and reasonable judging — because he was banned without serious grounds, but for Rebelli himself it's important to receive not an amnesty, but a complete acquittal.
Consideration of the Chinese question. Again, not "ban him!", but first think it over. And hear all opinions, and learn his explanations.
It would be very nice if someone took this burden upon themselves.