Турниры HeroesWorld Cup & World Cup - 2012

Continuing the topic. It seems to me that the controversial situation reached a dead end precisely because of the intervention of the "guru in retirement." Sticky talked to our hero's psychic, and that was that. "The giraffe is big; he knows best." Although, at first, nothing foreshadowed trouble. Sticky sowed the wind, and we see what he reaped. But the cunning "guru" is pulling another trick, and everyone around is to blame except him. He claims that Sticky succumbed to the bad influence of mythical vampires. Lo-lo-lo. Chronology: 1. First statement: the defenders of Rebell are fools. They don't speak with facts but express their opinion about Rebellius as a person. 2. Second statement: Rebellius defends himself so poorly that he is obviously guilty. 3. Third statement: to convince everyone of unfair play, analyzing the save files is not necessary. 4. Fourth statement: Stickyfingaz should not change his decision, even if it is wrong, because this is a sign of weakness. 5. Fifth statement: we pretend to be searching for justice, washing our hands. We demonstrate a sincere desire to find the truth. 6. Sixth statement: we gently hint that no one is capable of understanding the problems of the judging organization except the "guru." You can continue yourselves if you wish. And now, seriously: Note how Vik's posts differ from all other players' posts: The others put sincerity into their lines; when you read them, you can feel that the person cares about the discussion. And only one writes as if he is proving a mathematical theorem, coldly, dryly, and impassively. The logical content is excellent. But there is no ethical side at all; at first, it seemed like a kind of game. Like who can break whom. And then it suddenly became clear. In fact, he doesn't see anyone here as a person. And is this okay with everyone?