I want Stinger to learn to make decisions independently and without emotions in cases where all hope rests on him.

And that's exactly what he did – he made a firm decision and disqualified Ribellius. Yes, it might have been the wrong decision, but it was a firm one (he's not stupid; he perfectly understood the reaction it would provoke). So why, after he did what you wanted, are you trolling and discrediting his actions? Should he only make "firm" decisions that seem right to you?


In general, it turned out as usual – instead of offering and doing something constructive, most people will just sit around and criticize those few who are actually trying to do something. (This is just like old women on benches or people at gatherings – everyone feels like they're the smartest and starts criticizing how immoral the youth and the government are).


I don't understand why Stinger has to explain to everyone why he made a particular decision. You should accept it (his decision), yes, point out mistakes, but accept it. The person who should be thanked the most, who spent a huge amount of time and effort on this tournament, received a lot of criticism in return.

In his place, I would also wonder why I even need all this.

P.S. Moreover, as I think, this is even ingrained in the mentality; the Community from Western Europe would have reacted differently.