Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
rebelliousStatistics
Registered:
Posts:1,257
#568
Auto-translated
I strongly demand answers from the organizer Stickee to my questions posted on 06.06.2012, 20:41
Questions for the organizer. 1. If there was a judge vote on my issue, what was the breakdown and the final formulations (why is this information closed)? 2. Did interested parties — black_knight and Pit for LM — participate in making the decision on the ban? 3. If the opinion of "not just anyone in the community" was used in making the ban decision, then again — who expressed what, and with what conclusions? 4. If the saves were published on HeroesWorld, was there supposed to be a link between the discussion and the ban decision? 5. Although after the fact, how (by what criteria, characteristics) were the judges selected? (I'm afraid to even ask) Who is Spell5632?
-- -- Furthermore, what motives guided the judges/Stickee in making the ban decision, based on the information about the saves they received from Neoandi, including his comments in his interpretation (my direct competitor, the most interested party), and moreover accepting it as official? Saves
rebellious
