This is the wrong approach, and you were told about it back in Alex's case. It is not appropriate for a judge, even if making a decision collectively, to later deny responsibility, saying it wasn't them, it was them. Especially if their vote contributed to a decision that became final.
Stiky made the decision, and he is responsible for it before the public.
Firstly, no one is denying responsibility, saying it wasn't me, it was them. Your way of interpreting words and giving them the meaning you want is worthy of praise.
Slava said: "and by the way, the ban was issued based on the judges' vote; I didn't do it alone."
Where you see a denial of responsibility here is a mystery. It was simply a statement of facts.
Secondly, my position is based on the fact that since you chose the judges... don't blame them... they are guided by their own opinion. Please, run for judge to show your point of view.
The choice of judges (one or more) is our right. We used it.
No one is preventing you from expressing your opinion.
I believe it is wrong to blame the judges when you chose them yourself and gave them the right to decide.
It seems that if someone made a mistake, we will think more carefully before voting next time.
Let's also learn to respect the opinions of others, and not consider wrong anything that does not align with our own point of view.
