Don't forget that when you write something negative about Slava, it wasn't him who made the decision (I won't judge whether it was the right one or not).
There are judges... they voted.
Judges... I would like them to please everyone... but how to bring this desire to life... that's the question.
Stiky made the decision, and he is responsible for it before the public.
firstly, Heroes is not Mafia.
...
1.
2.
...
Stiky correctly stated that it is not in his best interest as an organizer to ban anyone, especially from among the strong players. Therefore, since he did it, it means he really believes he is right.
Looking for some sympathy for Pete or antipathy towards Rebel here is absurd. I also note that Rebel's defenders mainly focus on the ethical side of the issue - "he's a great guy, why are you banning him?!"
P.S. Wic, I'll touch on your "list" (where did Thinkeer come from??). It's an interesting thing, but only for internal use. After all, you wouldn't claim that everyone on your list is a map hacker.
I will express my opinion on the situation with Rebellious again.
In my opinion, online play in Heroes has practically completely discredited itself. You can always suspect your opponent of cheating and, if necessary, post saves with ambiguous decisions in order to remove the opponent from the tournament, ban him, and so on. That's why I'm no longer interested in ranked races, for example. You can only be sure when playing live.
No one says that professional sports are discredited because of doping.